IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS FOR STATE-INFLICTED TORTURE THE DEFENDANT’S ABSENCE CANNOT TURN INTO A “DE FACTO” IMMUNITY
Read the document
THE TERMINATION OF ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST GERMANY FOR REPARATION OWED TO VICTIMS OF WAR CRIMES COMMITTED DURING WORLD WAR II IS NOT UNCONSTITUTIONAL
A “RADICALLY OBSCURE” LAW IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE CONSTITUTION
THE RIGHT TO SILENCE ALSO APPLIES TO QUESTIONS ABOUT THE DEFENDANT’S PERSONAL QUALITIES
ITALY-TÜRKIYE: WORKSHOP ON “ACCESSING CONSTITUTIONAL JUSTICE”
ITALY-AUSTRIA: CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS DISCUSSED END-OF-LIFE MATTERS AND LOYAL COOPERATION WITH THE LEGISLATURE
THE AUTOMATIC REFUSAL TO RENEW A RESIDENCE PERMIT FOR WORK PURPOSES IN THE EVENT OF A CONVICTION FOR MINOR OFFENCES IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL. IT IS UP TO THE QUESTORE TO ASSESS THE SOCIAL DANGER POSED BY THE FOREIGNER ON A CASE-BY-CASE BASIS
COVID-19: BASED ON THE SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE AVAILABLE, MANDATORY VACCINATION WAS IMPOSED ON HEALTHCARE WORKERS. SWAB TESTS COULD NOT REPLACE VACCINATION IF INFECTION WAS TO BE PREVENTED.
COVID-19: MANDATORY VACCINATION FOR HEALTHCARE WORKERS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN UNREASONABLE OR DISPROPORTIONATE MEASURE IF THE GOAL IS TO PREVENT THE SPREAD OF THE VIRUS AND PRESERVE THE FUNCTIONING OF THE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM.