JOBS ACT AND COLLECTIVE DISMISSALS: THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT REITERATES LOYAL COOPERATION WITH THE COURT OF JUSTICE
Read the document
ROAD TRAFFIC INJURIES AND EX OFFICIO PROSECUTION: THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT CALLS ON THE LEGISLATOR TO RETHINK THE LAW CURRENTLY IN FORCE
THE “DECREE TO PREVENT PRISONER RELEASE” [“DECRETO ANTISCARCERAZIONI”] DOES NOT REDUCE THE PROTECTION AFFORDED TO PRISONERS’ HEALTH
SINGLE MUNICIPAL TAX (IMU) ON CAPITAL GOODS: ITS COMPLETE NON-DEDUCTIBILITY FROM INCOME TAXES IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL
THE CHALLENGES FILED AGAINST THE EXCLUSION OF SUMMARY PROCEEDINGS IN CASES INVOLVING CRIMES PUNISHABLE WITH LIFE IMPRISONMENT ARE UNFOUNDED
COVID-19 EMERGENCY: THE CHALLENGES TO THE SUSPENSION OF THE LIMITATION PERIOD ARE UNFOUNDED
LOCAL LANDSCAPE PLANS: THE REGIONS MUST ALWAYS ENGAGE WITH THE MINISTRY OF CULTURAL HERITAGE
VENETO REGION LAW ON “NEIGHBOURHOOD WATCH” ULTRA VIRES
HIGHER PENSIONS: THE “FREEZING” OF AUTOMATIC INCREASES AND THE SOLIDARITY CONTRIBUTION ARE ONLY LAWFUL IF REASONABLE AND PROPORTIONATE, ALSO IN TERMS OF THEIR DURATION
Prisons and the covid emergency: the constitutional Court rejects challenges to the “decree to prevent prisoner release” [“decreto antiscarcerazioni”]
JOBS ACT: THE QUESTIONS ON COLLECTIVE DISMISSALS ARE INADMISSIBLE
RECOGNISING SAME-SEX PARENTHOOD IS A TASK FOR THE LEGISLATOR, ALSO TO ENHANCE THE PROTECTION AFFORDED TO THE CHILD
COVID-19 EMERGENCY: FACILITATING JUDGES’ AND LAWYERS’ REMOTE PARTICIPATION IN PUBLIC HEARINGS
Subject: further measures for the conduct of public hearings, including remotely, during the COVID-19 health emergency.
LARGE-VALUE PENSIONS: “FREEZING” THEIR ADJUSTMENT FOR THREE YEARS IS CONSTITUTIONAL, IMPOSING A “SOLIDARITY CONTRIBUTION” FOR OVER THREE YEARS IS NOT